Short opinions and observations on product, engineering, and building things.https://emeryporter.net/https://emeryporter.net/posts/frameworks-marketing-miss/https://emeryporter.net/posts/frameworks-marketing-miss/If you are not part of the repairability/computer hobbyist space, you have probably never heard of the computer company Framework. Their big focus is hyper repairable and modular laptops/computers. They make laptops with features for productivity but target the most niche segment... why? I own a 13 inch Framework laptop. I bought it when I began my MBA in 2024 and I've used it constantly through the entire thing. It has been great. Last year I tripped down my stairs with the laptop open and smashed the camera but was able to fix it myself with no tools. The only downside is that it is impossible to recommend it because they don't target or position for a mainstream audience. Recently they announced a [new Pro model laptop](https://frame.work/blog/introducing-framework-laptop-13-pro) and during their announcement the CEO called the new flagship ["the MacBook Pro for Linux users"](https://www.engadget.com/computing/laptops/framework-launches-the-laptop-13-pro-with-intels-new-panther-lake-chips-181503934.html)... Framework positions themselves as a laptop for hobbyists or developers but I don't understand why they choose to make that distinction. The desire for repairable technology is not something that is [unique to hobbyists](https://innovation.consumerreports.org/cost-considerations-drive-consumer-repair-decisions/). During the two years of my MBA I encountered many people who either had a laptop with a broken screen, keyboard, etc., or had a new laptop entirely because their old one broke. None of these people are hobbyists yet all of them could use a premium laptop that could be repaired. So why is Framework still talking like it is? Their CEO calling out Linux and developers is a pretty deliberate targeting choice, and I can't imagine it is a large slice of the [addressable market for laptops](https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share/desktop/worldwide)... And when you look at [what Framework actually ships](https://frame.work/products/laptop) you'll see a premium consumer laptop with [the things laptop consumers want](https://www.consumerreports.org/electronics-computers/laptops-chromebooks/buying-guide/). I would go so far as to say that their segmentation is arbitrary because the features they offer to Linux users and developers have been offered by other companies as general productivity features ([3:2 displays offered by the MS Surface](https://news.microsoft.com/wp-content/uploads/prod/sites/562/2019/10/Surface-Laptop-3-fact-sheet-10-3.pdf)). The scariest part is that the incumbents are not that far behind. Lenovo's latest ThinkPads now [match Framework on repairability](https://www.ifixit.com/News/115827/new-thinkpads-score-perfect-10-repairability) and Apple is shipping [more repairable Macs than it has in over a decade](https://www.ifixit.com/News/116152/macbook-neo-is-the-most-repairable-macbook-in-14-years) (and I'm sure with their new hardware-focused leadership we will see even more modularity in their internal components). That head start is closing fast. Can anyone help me understand why they would choose this direction for their marketing approach? I mean take one look at their website and from their positioning it will instantly be clear whether you're part of their target segment regardless of whether you find value in their product. Feel free to email me at emery@emeryporter.netMon, 27 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMTMarketinghttps://emeryporter.net/posts/view-on-ai/https://emeryporter.net/posts/view-on-ai/For decades, businesses have been built on top of a discrete application layer, each application with its own interface, its own data silo, and its own learning curve. I believe this application layer is going away; replaced by an agentic layer that connects companies closer to their data than any application ever could, increasing revenue and enabling more creative, strategic, and genuinely fun human productivity. Beyond business, AI has lowered the barrier to entry for creative and technical work in amazing ways. Someone with an idea but no technical background can get a working prototype in front of people. An absolute beginner can get a personalized tutorial and learning plan based on their needs and learning style. AI doesn't (and shouldn't) replace the depth that comes from real learning and craft. But it does let more people get to the starting line. However, none of this matters if the people building these systems don't take safety seriously. As these models get more powerful, companies have a responsibility to build with empathy and well-defined safety practices. Consumers and stakeholders deserve to trust and understand what's being put in front of them.Sun, 12 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMTAI